Candid about
cameras
Ted Taylor
assesses a new generation of digital cameras, which are matching
traditional kit on quality and beating it on portability and - above
all - on price
We've all known
for some time that digital news acquisition equipment was coming
which would challenge the dominance of Betacam SP. Many had assumed
that the proven ruggedness of the half inch tape transport and head
assemblies would ensure that the new generation of digital field
equipment would also be based upon half inch tape technology.
And so it is
- in the guise of Betacam SX from Sony and Digital S from JVC. Both
these products, like their analogue forebears, perform well and
deliver many of the expected advantages of digital equipment: very
stable reliable electronics, little or no routine alignment, consistent
high quality performance and lots of whizzy features at a cost roughly
half that of Betacam SP. And let's not forget perhaps the greatest
benefit of all - the ability to stop worrying about tape generations
during the editing and copying process.
However, the
half inch tape-based camcorders have done little to address the
weight and bulk issues which are of perennial concern to cameramen
and women the world over. This is never more true than in the hazardous
situations illustrated so graphically and often tragically in the
work submitted to the Rory Peck Turst for consideration for its
awards. In these situations, maximum mobility coupled with minimum
visibility can save the situation from getting out of hand.
Perhaps then
it is no surprise that the new digital camcorders which are currently
creating so much interest are those based around the super compact
6mm cassettes.
These 6mm products
are available from a number of manufacturers in a number of variants.
On the professional front there is the Panasonic DVC Pro range with
compatible camcorders also manufactured by Ikegami, Philips and
Hitachi. From Sony there is the DV Cam range of 6mm professional
products, but beware! There are some format differences which prevent
DV Cam machines from replaying DVC Pro cassettes but, interestingly,
not vice versa.
Various models
of DVC Pro camcorders are available with both half inch and two
thirds inch CCDS and wide screen 16 by 9 options. All the two thirds
inch models easily meet the Independent Television Commission's
'code of practice' performance criteria, with the half inch models
very close. Maximum recording time is usually 63 minutes although
models exist which take the larger two-hour cassette.
The 6mm camcorders
are noticeably smaller and lighter than their half inch tape counterparts
and are very competitively priced, but the format has a further
key advantage - both DVC Pro and DV Cam VTRs can replay the mini
DV cassettes from the 'consumer' camcorders such as Sony's VX1000
and Panasonic's EZ1.
These so called
consumer camcorders offer incredible value for money in terms of
near broadcast performance at a cost of less than £3,000. Both the
VX1000 and the EZ1 are physically more like a domestic Hi 8 and
weigh in at around 1 kilogram. They also record 60 minutes of material
on a tiny cassette measuring only 66 mm by 48 mm by 12.2 mm and
weighing only a few grams - just think where you could hide those
when passing through border check points!
These mini DV
camcorders are not a universal replacement for the workhorse ENG
camcorder but can clearly offer advantages in physically restricted
spaces or when running to keep up with the action or when trying
to hide the equipment and look inconspicuous. They make an ideal
second camera or maybe for occasional use by journalists, but perhaps
I should not dwell on that use here!
The subjective
quality these mini DV camcorders produce, while falling short of
traditional broadcast measured standards, is nevertheless extremely
good, providing they are used sensibly and with regard to their
obvious limitations.
The main limitation
is the integral lens which has clearly been designed to a price.
But in good light they produce results which mainstream news organisations,
such as ITN, are happy to transmit - in fact there are times when
we are hard pressed to spot the mini DV pictures among all the rest.
It is generally
agreed that the Sony VX1000 consistently outperforms the rest of
the currently available consumer products. The VX1000 also does
16 x 9 at the flick of a switch, has a really excellent optical
image stabiliser and a remarkable minimum focus distance which is
ideal when shooting in very confined spaces.
It is this ability
to run a mixed economy of professional and consumer 6mm products,
with all the advantages of only requiring one type of VTR replay
and editing equipment, which has tipped the balance with a number
of the world's leading news gatherers and broadcasters. Currently
NBC, CBS, ITN , BBC and Reuters have all committed to 6mm formats
as well as many local news stations. Others are bound to follow
suit.
But there is
yet more good news. If you need to undertake clandestine shooting
or masquerade as a typical tourist, then there are a couple of really
tiny mini DV camcorders now on the market - the GRDV1 from JVC and
the PD1 from Sony.
These are even
smaller than current domestic 'palm cameras', weighing in at around
500 grams, yet still retain the ability to record a 63 minute cassette.
Performance is remarkable for their size but inevitably the physical
constraints have led to lens compromises which begin to limit the
quality noticeably, as does the introduction of electronic zooms
of up to 100 to 1!
Nevertheless
these 'micro' cameras are a huge leap forward in quality compared
with similar analogue systems and will enable broadcast-able pictures
to be shot in situations that would have been otherwise impossible.
Priced around
£1,500, I suspect they will soon be regarded as every cameraman's
essential accessory.
But this revolution
is not only about small camcorders, it is also being driven by new
innovative lightweight and compact editing equipment.
A product generating
a lot of interest is the Panasonic LT75 laptop editor which is an
entire edit suite in a briefcase. It has two tape transports, an
edit controller and two 6 inch flat screen monitors which can be
powered from camera batteries if required. The weight is around
12 kg - just think how much air freight is saved compared with a
traditional Betacam SP edit pack - and the purchase price is under
£25,000.
At that price
it is within reach of many freelance cameramen and women enabling
them to offer clients an end-to-end service by producing edited
stories instead of only piles of rushes. But the advantages are
more than just financial. Because it is not classed as freight it
can be hand carried on flights (assuming usual airline co-operation)
and therefore one can be first off the plane editing the first rushes
while the guy with the traditional edit pack is still at the airport
waiting for the freight to be off-loaded and looking for a van.
Also, with a
device like the LT75, you have the convenience of not being stuck
at some fixed location but can easily keep the editing close to
the shooting action. Carrying the LT75 to the feed point is no problem
but other lightweight compact field VTR's are available at sensible
costs which probably mean machines can be left at strategic locations.
To be absolutely
fair Sony have exceeded expectations and produced a very similar
briefcase editor for their half inch Betacam SX format (the A220)
which is broadly the same weight, size and price as Panasonic's
LT75 - a remarkable achievement considering the disparity in physical
cassette sizes.
Another innovative
piece of post production equipment from the Panasonic 6mm stable
is the Quickcutter non-linear edit system. Essentially, this is
a Pentium desktop PC running well designed non-linear editing software
but with a four times normal speed DVC Pro transport built into
the PC.
The system is
therefore 'complete' and requires no additional equipment or cabling
to enable it to accept DVC Pro cassette rushes and finally dump
results back onto a cassette for transmission.
Not only is
downloading and uploading done at four times normal speed but the
system can multi-task, allowing editing to be carried out while
downloading from tape.
And finally,
as we tend to say at ITN, a word about technical quality issues.
I have heard doubts expressed in some quarters that the picture
quality of the 6mm professional products - let alone the consumer
products - has been significantly compromised by limitations in
the digital compression process. No, the 6mm systems are not 4:2:2
sampled and while some compromises have clearly been made these
do not appear to adversely affect the subjective performance and
are more than offset by the other benefits of having a digital system.
I suggest you
do not get too hung up about bit rates, sampling rates and coding
processes but look at the pictures instead. For news use there is
absolutely no quality reason not to choose 6mm professional products.
Perhaps, therefore,
it is not too surprising, when all these factors are considered,
that the 6mm digital revolution looks set to challenge the previous
dominance of half inch cassette systems.
Finally, speaking
of freelancers - operating in taxing situations worldwide, thinking
on their feet, needing to be quick and confident - equipment suppliers
are their natural bedfellows and therefore should support the Rory
Peck Award and Trust in every possible way.
|